Category: Uncategorized

  • The Why, Who, What, When, How and Where of Anti-Obesity Medications

    We are all motivated to eat. This is a basic function of survival. In fact, our brains are equipped with an ancient motivational system that ensures we are driven subconsciously to hunt and gather (“go and get”) food, particularly calorie-dense foods. This ancient system can lead to overeating and weight gain in our modern food environment.

    The Why, Who, What, When, How and Where of Anti-Obesity Medications

    Earlier modules have described the risk of overweight and obesity to be a real, genetically conferred, brain-centred, progressive, chronic disease. Earlier modules have also stated that real, safe and effective treatments exist for this condition. The first pillar of overweight and obesity treatment is behavioural therapy. The second treatment pillar is anti-obesity medications (AOMs). The third treatment pillar is surgery. The focus of this module is on anti-obesity medications.

    Today, safe and effective AOMs exist as adjunct to behavioural therapy. You can anticipate that progressively more effective AOMs will play a central role in obesity treatment, much like medications do with hypertension, diabetes, asthma and arthritis medications. It is anticipated that AOMs will eventually compete with bariatric surgery in weight loss and health outcomes.


    In Canada, obesity surgery includes the sleeve gastrectomy, the gastric bypass or the duodenal switch. You may think that the weight loss effects of these procedures take place at the level of the abdomen, however, perhaps surprisingly, the majority of the weight loss effects of these procedures is accomplished via a strong influence on all three layers of the appetite system as described here in the case of gastric bypass.


    why medication?

    Why would anyone need medication or surgery in the first place?

    In earlier modules you learned that weight is regulated within your brain with a three-level appetite system. You will have learned in the restraint module that behavioural therapy targets the third level, the executive system. To be specific, behavioural therapy empowers you with skills that awaken your sleepy executive system just when he or she is most needed. Your executive system is where thinking happens, and you have access to your thinking.

     

    It is different for the other two levels of your appetite system. You do not have access to these two levels, yet, as you have learned, these two levels are critical in regulating your weight.  Specifically, they defend against weight loss and drive WANTING. This defense, meant to promote weight gain, comes in the form of increased appetite and decreased metabolic rate. We learn here how hormonal changes signal the brain to defend against weight loss by increasing appetite, and we see here how this increase promotes slowing weight loss and the risk of weight regain.

     

    While you don’t have access to these two layers of the brain, AOMs and surgery do.

     

    One way to think about the role of AOMs and surgery is to consider them as defences against the defence.

    Both Liraglutide 3.0 and Naltrexone/Buproprion act on the brain and directly influence activity at the level of the homeostatic system (GATEKEEPER) and the motivational (GO-GETTER) system. Orlistat, an older medication, does not work on the brain and will not be further discussed in this document. Certainly, ask your physician about Orlistat if you are interested in hearing more.

    MEDICATION AND THE GATEKEEPER

    Liraglutide 3.0, as shown here, and Naltrexone/Buproprion, shown here, directly influence the GATEKEEPER, specifically landing at the gate to the GATEKEEPER, the arcuate nucleus. This stimulates fullness and lowers appetite, countering the upward pressure effect of weight loss! This is where most of the body’s appetite hormones act to signal the brain.

    MEDICATION AND THE GOGETTER

    The central role of WANTING has been established in the WANTING module

    WANTING drives excessive calorie intake, and excessive calorie intake drives weight gain (and confounds weight loss). Both Liraglutide 3.0 and Naltrexone/Bupropion reduce WANTING via their influence on the GOGETTER.

    One way to measure WANTING is via the validated Control of Eating Questionnaire (COEQ) here, which measures the strength of WANTING. Here, a glp-1 analogue called Semaglutide 2.4 mg, a once-weekly medication which is currently under consideration by the FDA as a new AOM, significantly lowers scores on the COEQ. Here, Naltrexone/ Bupropion also reduce scores on the COEQ.

    Another potential way to measure WANTING is functional MRI studies. Here, Liraglutide 3.0 treatment, and here, Naltrexone/Bupropion treatment are associated with fMRI changes consistent with a reduced WANTING response in the GOGETTER.

    Outcomes

    Clinical trials are conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of an AOM.

     

    Here, Liraglutide 3.0, combined with lifestyle counseling, resulted in an 8.0% weight loss at one year.

    Here, naltrexone/bupropion, combined with lifestyle counseling, was associated with weight loss of 6.1% at one year. 

     

    Responders to AOMs are broken into two categories 

    1. Early responders: Someone who, upon starting an AOM, loses greater than or equal to 5% of body weight within 12–16 weeks. 

    2. Non-early responders: Those that do not lose 5% or more at 12-16 weeks.

     

    Not responding to one AOM does not mean the same person would not respond to another AOM. 

     

    So what are the outcomes if we only consider those who responded to the AOM and would be likely to continue on an AOM? Here, early responders to Naltrexone/Bupropion had lost an average of 12% of their body weight at one year. Here, early responders to Liraglutide 3.0 mg lost an average 10.8% at one year. Here, the anticipated AOM Semaglutide 2.4mg showed an average weight loss of 17.4% when considering all subjects after 68 weeks. What about the early responder numbers from this study? This has not been calculated yet but you can assume it will be significantly more than 17.4%.

    Treatment with these AOMs is also associated with significant improvements in weight-related conditions such as high cholesterol, blood pressure and blood sugars.



    WHO SHOULD CONSIDER MEDICATION?

    You have learned that many people living with overweight or obesity have internalized the pervasive shame and blame narrative and believe that theirs is a moral failure, and a failure in motivation and strength. As described in the internalized weight bias module, the opposite is true: overweight and obesity is a consequence of a primarily genetically conferred, central nervous system-based, environmentally influenced, progressive, medical condition. In this alternative narrative, medication is seen as a treatment for a real condition. And so, the individual who should consider medication is the individual who has been invited to consider medication as an effective treatment for a real condition. The decision to take or not take an AOM is yours. A clinician’s role is to invite and inform you as to the benefits, risks and appropriateness of medication in your treatment. The rest is up to you.

     

    This next point is important. Ideally, AOM use is combined with behavioural therapy. Medication is often described as an adjunct to behavioural therapy and so, the individual who should consider medication is the individual who has been invited to consider behavioural therapy. Ideally, this behavioural therapy is provided by a practitioner certified in overweight and obesity treatment. Certifications in obesity medicine are becoming much more common.

     

    When discussing who should consider AOM use, it is important to describe the concept of indications and contraindications—literally the things that would make you an appropriate candidate for treatment, and the things that would preclude you from using the medication.

     

    Indications: 

    1. A BMI of 30 or above, or 

    2. A BMI of 27 and above if associated with comorbidity such as hypertension, diabetes, elevated cholesterol, sleep apnea, and osteoarthritis. 

     

    The reasoning here is that these conditions are strongly associated with weight and that weight loss is strongly associated with improvements in these conditions. All AOMs in Canada are formally described as “an adjunct to reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity for chronic weight management.” 

     

    Contraindications:
    Each medication has its own list of contraindications and you should learn these from your prescribing doctor.


    WHAT MEDICATION SHOULD YOU CONSIDER?

    All three available AOMs in Canada: Orlistat, Liraglutide 3.0 and Naltrexone/Bupropion are safe and effective; speak to your physician for a full review. Both Liraglutide 3.0 and Naltrexone/Bupropion are well-tolerated, and studies show discontinuation due to side effects is rare.

    Which medication would be most effective for you? Before trying a medication, there is no way of knowing or predicting your response. When it comes to medication (or behavioural therapy or surgery), there are responders and there are non-responders.



    WHEN WITHIN TREATMENT, SHOULD YOU CONSIDER MEDICATION?

    Behavioural treatment is the foundation of the treatments of overweight and obesity. When considering AOM use, consider the following four options:

    Treatment Exists

    Internalized bias is also countered by learning that effective long-term treatment exists for overweight and obesity. The three treatments are behavioural intervention, medication and surgery.

    Treatment Exists

    Internalized bias is also countered by learning that effective long-term treatment exists for overweight and obesity. The three treatments are behavioural intervention, medication and surgery.

    OPTION 1 is to not use an AOM at all. With expert behavioural treatment, 33% of individuals will lose at least 10 % of their body weight at the end of one year of treatment. This group is considered responders to a behavioural treatment. With less than expert behavioural treatment, you can still expect a significant number of responders. Behavioural therapy alone can be effective for a significant number of individuals.

    OPTION 2sees you starting medication in concert with the initiation of behavioural therapy. This is a reasonable option, and if you are a responder, you will likely lose significantly more weight than with behavioural therapy alone.

    OPTION 3 is to consider adding an AOM if behavioural therapy alone is associated with a non-response. Again, not every individual is a significant responder to behavioural therapy. The addition of an AOM in this situation can dramatically improve your weight loss and even “open” an ability to excel at behavioural therapy.

    OPTION 4 would be a consideration if, with behavioural therapy alone, your BEST WEIGHT is not associated with best health and quality of life. In the expectations module it is clearly described that all weight loss curves have a characteristic shape, with successful weight loss slowing and slowing and eventually flattening at one’s BEST WEIGHT (formerly called the plateau). If your BEST WEIGHT is not associated with best health and quality of life with behavioural therapy alone, the addition of an AOM can significantly further weight loss, resulting in another curve the same shape but landing further down.

    Again, WHEN to initiate medication can be discussed in consultation with a physician, but the decision of if and when to initiate an AOM is ultimately yours.


    HOW TO INITIATE AN AOM

    Initiating an AOM begins with you learning how the medication works and being advised in detail regarding any risks and side effects. You would learn about a stepwise dose escalation that you should be personally in control of. The dose escalation can help you minimize side effects and consider the lowest effective dose for the AOM. It will be explained to you that because the disease of overweight and obesity is life-long, the treatment is also considered life-long. Prescription of an AOM is envisioned to be a long-term treatment, not a short-term one. Having said that, some patients may consider, at some point, a trial of coming off the AOM and deciding for themselves on a weight management path with or without medication. After initiating an AOM, you should be assessed for: 1) a measured appetite response, 2) reported weight (if you wish), and 3) improvements in quality of life and health factors such as bloodwork and measurement of disease risk factors.


    WHERE COULD YOU BE PRESCRIBED AN AOM?

    This is important. This author anticipates a time in the near future when primary care doctors globally will have confidence and competence in treating patients with overweight or obesity, providing a behavioural intervention and possibly medication as an addition to treatment. You may need to be an advocate for yourself based on the medical system you are in. You have learned from the Internalized Weight Bias Module that many, including health care practitioners, still think of overweight and obesity as a matter of willpower, diet and exercise: “eat less, move more.” This means that you may be faced with overcoming bias and discrimination in order to gain access to credible, ethical, expert and effective treatment. Also, when discussing where you may access treatment, a modern note: There is every reason to believe that effective overweight and obesity treatment can be provided remotely. Please access the upcoming remote treatment module.

  • Restraint

    Did you know permission thoughts exist for a reason? For our ancestors, when a calorie opportunity was subconsciously recognized (WANTING), thoughts immediate followed as to how and why they should GO AND GET. These thoughts did nothing less than ensure survival in a calorie-unreliable world. It makes sense these thoughts would be persuasive. It also makes sense that these thoughts would be automatic. They are learned from past successful food-finding missions.

    Restraint Skill Development

    This section describes how to develop, as best as you can, the capacity to restrain against WANTING. Restraint means changing your thinking and then your behaviour in moments of WANTING. This section is about the processes of human decision making. WANTING, when it is reflexively triggered, gets shuttled up to what is called the executive system, front of our brain, the conscious part of our brain and the part of the brain where decisions get made. 

     

    To understand this part of the brain, think of it as being composed of two parts. To best understand this, when you have time, please reference this video, featuring Daniel Kahneman. One part is called the autopilot, or system one, and is a fast and automatic system of thinking and decision making that focuses on immediate gratification. The second is the potential hero of this story and is called the sleepy executive, or system two, which is a slow, deliberate system of thinking that is able, when considering choices, to weigh consequences and consider the future. To further understand the sleepy executive, or system two, there is one more key point: this part that thinks slowly and about the future, is usually fast asleep and not involved in most decisions. Most decisions get made by the first system, the autopilot, the fast thinking system, especially decisions around food. These automatic thoughts are also called ‘cognitive bias.’ 

     
    This section discusses the skill of waking and using the sleepy executive to your advantage in moments of WANTING. These are the key decision moments regarding eating and drinking (and activity) that determine one’s best weight. This skill of restraint goes by many names in the literature, depending on whether you are reading neuroscience or psychology, but we will use the term ‘cognitive restraint,’ described by Rena Wing, the grandmother of behavioural weight management, as the “central behavioural attribute of those that sustainably lose weight.”

    Simply said, when it comes to restraint skills, not everyone is on an even playing field. Cognitive-executive restraint is considered a variable trait and is highly heritable. Fortunately, effective behavioural strategies exist, along a spectrum, to improve restraint skills. Restraint skill development involves changing thinking. Cognitive-behavioural therapy and acceptance-based therapy play a large part in restraint skill development. The skill of cognitive restraint can be learned and improved over time and with repetition, much like a muscle working against resistance builds in strength and gets bigger. In fact, MRI studies have shown changes in this part of the brain in as early as 12 weeks in those who successfully practice restraint!

     

    In this section, you will be invited to discover, challenge and ultimately change autopilot thoughts, also called ‘permission thoughts.’ Permission thoughts speak in a moment of WANTING about why one SHOULD eat or eat more. These thoughts sound like justifications or rationalizations as to why you SHOULD eat or eat more. New thinking in moments of WANTING can be learned and practiced and this new ‘restraint thinking’ represents the foundation of sustained behavioural change. In best weight terms, this is the skill that generates adherence to a long-term-overall-lower calorie intake. 

     

    Now we live in an environment where calories are limitless, yet permission thoughts are a built-in part of food decisions that drive us in the opposite direction of our best weight. Permission thinking is another example of a system that conferred advantage in a former environment that now confers disadvantage in this one.

     

    So WANTING and permission thinking are automatic. We don’t control them and they come from, in one case, a subconscious part and in the other case an automatic part of our appetite system. They come from underneath as we navigate this food-filled environment.


    STEP 1: Capturing Permission Thoughts

    Capturing permission thoughts sounds easy enough, but in fact, permission thoughts as discussed earlier are automatic and fleeting, and often go unnoticed. 

     

    Permission thoughts have unique characteristics.

    1. They immediately follow WANTING 

    2. They are automatic, not controllable. 

    3. They may sound persuasive and convincing in the moment, but by nature they are irrational and untrue, in fact often the direct opposite of the truth. 

    The following are examples of what permission thoughts may sound like. They are so common and universal, they can be categorized: 

    1. Credit Card – I can have this now, and later… I’ll eat less.

    2. Deserved/Earned – I’ve had such a hard day, I deserve this…

    3. Gateway – I’ll just go and see what there is. I’ll just have a small amount of this… 

    4. Resignation – I’m not losing weight anyway so I may as well …

    5. On track – I’ve been doing so well lately I deserve…

    6. Off track – I’ve been doing so poorly lately, I may as well…

    7. Social-Cultural Norms – It would be rude in this circumstance to not eat this… 

    8. The Rebel – No one can tell me what I can and can’t do. I can do what I want and so…

    9. Balancing Calories – I have room for this in my calorie target so….

    10. The Straw Man Argument – I’m not eating donuts and ice cream (suggesting that you are making a relatively healthy choice) so this is fine…

    11. Utilitarian – This will help me. This will help me feel less stressed / tired / upset / sad and so…

    12. Novel – I have not had this for a long time so…

    13. Hedonist – This is great, I just love this…

    Where’s the Evidence?

    Imagine you have been accused of a crime and you’re standing in court. The prosecution lawyer stands up and gives the jury three convincing arguments as to why you should be convicted. The jurors nod their heads in agreement with each of the prosecutor’s points. You’re worried. The prosecution rests. If the case ended here you would most likely be convicted. But what about the defense lawyer? Imagine next that a highly skilled defense lawyer stands up and expertly refutes and discredits the prosecution’s three arguments. Case closed; you go free. 

    STEP 2: Challenging Permission Thinking

    Once you have captured your permission thoughts, ask, “where’s the evidence?” What is the evidence, if any, that supports your thinking, and what evidence does not support your thinking?

    To challenge permission thoughts you need to bring forward evidence that refutes and discredits your permission thinking to ‘sway your jury’ back in your favour. The evidence is called restraint thinking, but for our purposes it is also called ‘values-based thinking.’ Do I value this? Is this important to me? How will I feel afterwards?

    Credit Card

    “I can have this now, and later… I’ll eat less.”

     


     

    “I have said this before and not eaten less later, and anyway this is about this moment and building this skill in this moment.”

    Deserved / Earned

    “I’ve had such a hard day, I deserve this…”

     


     

    “If it comes down to what I deserve, I deserve to feel in the direction of what’s important to me. This is not important to me and in fact this would leave me feeling regretful and unhappy and I don’t deserve that.”

    GATEWAY

    “I’ll just go and see what there is. I’ll just have a small amount of this… “

     


     

    If I go and see I will be more likely to have something, and if I have something I will be likely to have more.”

    resignation

    “I’m not losing weight anyway so I may as well…”

     


     

    “Struggling with weight is a real condition. I have support, I have access to treatment, this is a long-term project and every moment of restraint counts.”

    On Track

    “I’ve been doing so well lately I deserve…”

     


     

    “If this is important to me I can have it, but not for this reason. Rewarding ‘doing well’ with a setback does not make sense. “

    Off Track

    “I’ve been doing so poorly lately, so I may as well…”

     


     

    “Struggling with weight is a real condition. I have support, I have access to treatment, this is a long-term project and every moment of restraint counts.”

    Social-Cultural Norms

    “It would be rude in this circumstance to not eat this… “

     


     

    “I value food and fun, drinks, socialization and celebration. Is this valued because if not, I should figure out how to advocate for myself and continue in the direction of what is important to me.”

    The Rebel

    “No one can tell me what I can and can’t do. I can do what I want and so…”

     


     

    “I should do what I want… but do I want this? Is this important to me, because if it isn’t, I may feel regretful and unhappy afterwards and that I don’t want.”

    Balancing Calories

    “I have room for this in my calorie target so…”

     


     

    “My key skill is restraint in the moment of WANTING; effort against resistance builds my restraint skills like exercise builds muscle. Landing at the right calorie level in a day is a secondary consideration. If I am hungry or If I really value this then fine, but otherwise just because I have ‘room’ does not mean I should eat it.”

    The Straw Man Argument

    “I’m not eating donuts and ice cream (suggesting that you are making a relatively healthy choice) and so this is fine…”

     


     

    “My effort should be in the direction of restraint skill development, so if this is not for hunger and is not important to me, I can pass.”

    Utilitarian

    “This will help me. This will help me feel less stressed / tired / upset / sad and so…”

     


     

    “After eating this, will I feel less stressed / tired / upset / sad? I know I will feel relief from WANTING, but only for a moment and nothing else will change. In fact, I may feel more stressed / tired / upset / sad after eating it.”

    Novel

    “I have not had this for a long time so…”

     


     

    “If this is important to me I should have it, but the length of time since I last had it will not play into my decision.”

    Hedonist

    “This is great, I just love this…”

     


     

    “Is this important to me now and how will I feel afterwards? My efforts should be in the direction of restraint skill development and finding my best weight.”

    You may notice a pattern in the examples.                         

    Three questions are suggested to be at the root of restraint thinking. 

     

    • Is this aligned with my values? 

    • How will I feel afterwards? 

    • Is this building my restraint skills or impairing them? 

     

    You may notice that permission thoughts focus on the immediate and discount the future.

    You may also notice that restraint thoughts do the opposite.

    STEP 3: Creating and practicing restraint thinking

    Once you have captured and challenged permission thinking, new restraint/values-based thinking can essentially write itself.

    “I have said this before and not eaten less later, and anyway this is about this moment and building this skill in this moment.”

     


     

    “Having this as a reward for ‘doing well’ does not make sense. If I valued this then fine, but I don’t”

     


     

    “My key skill is restraint in the moment of WANTING; effort against resistance builds my restraint skills like exercise builds muscle. Landing at the right calorie level in a day is a secondary consideration. If I am hungry or If I really value this then fine, but otherwise just because I have ‘room’ does not mean I should eat it.”

     


     

    “Is this important to me now and how will I feel afterwards? My efforts should be in the direction of restraint skill development and finding my best weight.”

     


     

    “After eating this, will I feel less stressed / tired / upset / sad? I know I will feel relief from WANTING, but only for a moment and nothing else will change. In fact, I may feel more stressed / tired / upset / sad after eating it.”

     


     

    “I should do what I want… but do I want this? Is this important to me, because if it isn’t, I may feel regretful and unhappy afterwards and that I don’t want.”

     


     

    “If I go and see I will be more likely to have something, and if I have something I will be likely to have more.”

     


     

    “If this decision comes down to what I deserve, I deserve to feel in the direction of what’s important to me. This is not important to me and in fact this would leave me feeling regretful and unhappy and I don’t deserve that.”

     


     

    “I value food and fun, drinks, socialization and celebration. Is this valued because if not, I should figure out how to advocate for myself and continue in the direction of what is important to me.”

     


     

    “Struggling with weight is a real condition. I have support, I have access to treatment, this is a long-term project and every moment of restraint counts and builds my restraint skill”. 

     


     

    “Just because I have not had this for some time is not a reason to have it. I can have this if it is important to me, otherwise I will continue working in the direction of restraint development.”

     


     

    “Just because this is healthier than junk food does not mean I should eat it. I’m not hungry and I don’t value this and my effort should be in the direction of restraint skill development, so I will pass.”

    Amazingly, if done properly, displacing permission thoughts can directly reduce WANTING!  Like turning down a dimmer switch, restraint thoughts may dim or turn down the volume of the impulse, literally making WANTING feel less strong!

  • Modulators

    Working to find your BEST WEIGHT is tough enough in itself. Unfortunately, certain ‘internal states’ can make this process even more difficult. Within this module you will be introduced to a finite list of modulators that can be obstacles between you and your BEST WEIGHT. Any weight management effort may be negatively affected by:


    Not everyone who has overweight/obesity is negatively affected by every modulator, and therefore you should be supported in a personalized discovery and review of each one and how they apply to you.

     

    Managing these barriers starts with understanding how they work. Fortunately, this is not complicated. You are reminded that overeating is driven by both the GATEKEEPER (hypothalamus/homeostatic system) and the GOGETTER (the motivation/reward system), and the only thing we have to stand up to it all is the Sleepy Executive (executive system).

     

    The risk of the modulators is that they will do one of these three things.

    Increase activity of the GATEKEEPER

    Increase the learning and strength of the GOGETTER

    Increase the sleepiness of the Sleepy Executive, leaving the executive system’s autopilot with free reign

    All effective weight management strategies should regularly consider and revisit this list of modulators as possible obstacles and targets of intervention.


    STRESS

    Stress is your body’s response to challenge or demand. In short bursts, stress can be positive, helping you overcome an acute threat or challenge. If prolonged, however, stress can affect quality of life, health and weight. Stress plays a role in the development of overweight and obesity across a number of pathways. Our stress system evolved to help us escape life-threatening situations; stress will dump glucose into our bloodstream so that muscles have energy for fight or flight. However, in the modern world, most stress is psychological, yet our bodies respond as if the challenge were a physical one. 

     

    • Epidemiological studies show an association between stress and weight

    • Meta-analysis shows a relationship between stress and weight gain

     

    Stress results in the release of the cortisol hormone from our adrenal glands and promotes fat gain within the abdominal cavity, depositing the unhealthy version of fat—the fat within the centre of the body. 

     

    Stress and the GOGETTER. The motivation system (the GOGETTER) is temporarily, directly and indirectly strengthened by stress.

     

    Stress directly increases the neurotransmitter dopamine, which directly raises WANTING. Indirectly, stress results in the release of cortisol, which then directly makes the motivation system (the GOGETTER) more sensitive to cues in the environment that activate it, as well as strengthening WANTING.

     

    The hormones leptin and ghrelin also react to stress. Leptin and ghrelin affect weight in opposite ways, with leptin suppressing appetite and ghrelin stimulating it. Ghrelin stimulates the GOGETTER and leptin sedates it. 

    Differences in leptin responses to stress may be associated with individual differences, which determine whether stress generates weight gain or weight loss. Stress raises leptin, and higher leptin responses to stress may protect against weight gain. Ghrelin levels also increase in stress conditions, which could promote weight gain.

     

    Under stressful circumstances, high-calorie, hyper-palatable foods are preferred. If this is not unfair enough, this type of eating under the influence of stress can further program, strengthen and chronically sensitize the GOGETTER, thereby progressively and chronically strengthening WANTING.

     

    Stress and the Sleepy Executive. Stress can significantly undermine restraint over WANTINGEarly life stress can be particularly damaging to executive self-regulation skills. Stress directly decreases executive functioning and self-regulation, making the Sleepy Executive unmistakably sleepier.

     

    Stress and weight bias. People living with overweight and obesity may frequently experience weight bias, stigma and discrimination. Weight bias relates to the negative weight-related attitudes, beliefs and assumptions about people with overweight and obesity. Evidence points to the stressful nature of the experience of weight bias as having a negative effect on all the above pathways, which can challenge weight loss and lead to further weight gain. The stress of weight bias has been demonstrated to create a vicious cycle where stress can lead to weight gain, which can lead to stress and so on.



    short sleep duration

    Disturbed sleep and fatigue. Decades of evidence now describe an association between sleep and eating. 

     

    As described by Jean-Philippe Chaput:


    It may not be that easy to study, but the majority of the evidence suggests that short sleep duration is a causal force in weight gain and an obstacle to weight loss. Less sleep is simply considered a part of modern living. There is a growing consensus that short sleep duration is not only associated with weight but also with type 2 diabetes, heart disease, hypertension and mortality.

     

    The association between weight and sleep can be understood by describing the effects of short sleep duration on the three levels/characters of the appetite system.

     

    The GATEKEEPER 
    As a reminder, the GATEKEEPER defends against weight loss by responding to lower leptin levels. A landmark study by Karine Spiegel showed that two days of shorter sleep duration than the recommended number of hours induced an 18% drop in leptin. The same study also showed that short sleep duration increased the hunger/WANTING hormone, ghrelin, by 28%, and these hormone changes were also associated with reports of increased sensations of hunger and appetite.

     

    The GOGETTER

    Functional MRI is a form of MRI that is used in real time to show changes in brain activity in response to stimuli. Functional MRI studies are providing evidence that short sleep duration enhances the activity of the GOGETTER.

     

    You will be reminded that the GOGETTER is the underlying drive to consume calories, also known as WANTING, and the GOGETTER represents the motivation or reward system—the middle layer of the three-layer human appetite system. 

     

    Short sleep duration in these studies is associated with

    1. greater activation of the motivation system

    2. a greater sensitivity to images of calorie dense and tasty foods that goes away with normal sleep 

     

    Taken together, this suggests that a short sleep duration can result in more persistent and taller waves of WANTING sent up to the executive system.

     

    The Sleepy Executive
    Studies also suggest that sleep restriction alters the sleepiness of the Sleepy Executive. Remember, the Sleepy Executive is the restraint and inhibition region of our executive system that challenges the automatic permission thoughts from our autopilot.

     

    FMRI studies confirm that sleep deprivation reduces activity in areas that are associated with restraint and inhibition. Studies show that sleep-restricted adolescents eat foods higher in quick energy, and that sleep-restricted adults show less activity in the areas of inhibition and food intake increases. This all suggests that short sleep duration significantly makes the already Sleepy Executive sleepier.

     

    Also of note, it is suggested that short sleep duration increases dangerous intra-abdominal fat and is associated with hyperactivity of the “stress circuit” called the HPA-axis, resulting in increased release of the stress hormone cortisol.


    DEPRESSION

    The relationship between depression and weight can be thought of as bi-directional, meaning that having one increases your risk of the other. A 2010 systematic review and meta-analysis that studied over 58,000 people suggested that obesity increases the risk of depression, and depression was predictive of developing obesity.

     

    You may be surprised to learn that with depression, not everyone is at risk of weight gain. Some people with depression increase appetite and weight, and others actually find the opposite—decreased appetite and weight loss.

     

    You may not be surprised to know that according to FMRI evidence, the GOGETTER is responsible for these differences. Simmons et al. showed that depression-related increases in appetite are associated with overactivity of the GOGETTER, or mesolimbic reward circuit.

     

    Consistent with the concept of bidirection, Sharma et al. found in mice that chronic consumption of high-fat food and associated weight gain induced plasticity-related changes in the reward circuit (GOGETTER) that are associated with depression.

     

    Not to leave out the Sleepy ExecutiveCserjési et al. studied the relationship between depression and executive function. They found a mediating role of depression between executive self-regulation skills and obesity. This suggests that depression may play a role in making the Sleepy Executive sleepier in those with both depression and weight gain.



    ADHD

    Various categories of studies have demonstrated an association between ADHD and symptoms of overweight and obesity.

     

    Consistent with our theme, Seymour et al. found that there appears to be significant overlap in the neurological circuits that mediate ADHD and obesity. Specifically, they found overlap within the motivational system (GOGETTER) and the circuits that mediate response inhibition and regulation (the Sleepy Executive).


    PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND SEDENTARINESS

    The relationship between physical activity and weight regulation is not straightforward. For more, see the Diet, Exercise and Calorie Deficit module.

     

    Shan et al. showed that moderate to vigorous physical activity is associated with decreased brain response to high-calorie food cues in the region of the motivational system or GOGETTER, suggesting that physical activity can decrease WANTING. They also showed that sedentary behaviour was correlated with greater reactivity and stronger GOGETTER-generated WANTING.

     

    Again, not to leave out the Sleepy Executive, numerous meta-analyses, including that of Moreau et al., have found that moderate- and high-intensity exercise has a positive impact on executive function, and restraint is a key executive function.



    GOING TOO LONG WITHOUT FOOD

    From an evolutionary perspective, the GOGETTER has two roles: 1) produces the drive to GO AND GET food when food may be scarce, and 2) promotes overeating when food is available in order to establish energy stores for an uncertain future.

    When we go too long without food, this motivation system gets temporarily strengthened. WANTING gets stronger. A major supporter of this temporary strengthening is the food intake-promoting hormone ghrelin. Ghrelin is produced in the stomach and is at its highest levels before we eat.

    Perello and Dickson describe how ghrelin directly signals both the GATEKEEPER (the hypothalamus) and the GOGETTER (the motivation/reward system) to promote GOING AND GETTING, and then eating.

    The most likely causes of increased release of ghrelin include:

    1. Going too long without food

    2. Anticipation of food

    3. Weight loss

    4. Psychological stress

    In the case of going too long without food, the signals that result in ghrelin release include low blood glucose and the release of a hormone called norepinephrine. Simply anticipating tasty, hyper-palatable food may also result in ghrelin release. 

    Again, working towards your BEST WEIGHT is tough enough. Modulators can make it more difficult. Please advocate for yourself. It is recommended that your health care practitioner(s) actively assess you for the effects of this finite list of modulators and diagnose and treat them if necessary. If modulators are determined to be affecting your weight, please consider treatments such as stress reduction/management strategies, sleep testing for sleep apnea, treatment for insomnia, treatment for depression and ADHD, strategies to increase physical activity, and consideration of avoiding going too long without food.

  • Wanting

     We are all motivated to eat. This is a basic function of survival. In fact, our brains are equipped with an ancient motivational system that ensures we are driven subconsciously to hunt and gather (“go and get”) food, particularly calorie-dense foods. This ancient system can lead to overeating and weight gain in our modern food environment.

    Wanting – the Motivation to GO AND GET Calories

    This section can be thought of as the beginning of treatment. We have already established that excessive calorie intake drives weight gain and confounds weight loss. But what drives excessive calorie intake? You might think the answer is complicated but it isn’t. 

    The answer lies in the middle layer of the appetite system. The appetite system has three layers, with the middle layer best known as the motivational system. The human appetite system evolved from living in an environment where calories were often scarce and finding food involved work, hence the motivation to GO AND GET. The prevailing understanding of how and why obesity happens is that this ancient system has collided with the modern food environment; this ultra-processed, sugar, fat and salt added, big-portioned, everywhere, anytime, aggressively advertised,  delivered-right-to-your-front-door food environment. It is also important to note that even the overabundance of healthy food in our current food environment can drive the overconsumption of calories and contribute to weight gain. The assumption that weight gain, overweight and obesity are always a result of unhealthy and/or highly processed junk and fast food is both flawed and highly stigmatizing. 

     

    Ivan Pavlov was a Russian scientist in the early 1900s. You may recall his famous experiment where dogs salivated to the sound of a bell. By repeatedly pairing the bell with the delivery of tasty sausage powder to dogs, the bell alone eventually became a powerful trigger of salivation (i.e. WANTING) in the dogs. Salivation is a reflexive and automatic response to the anticipation of food, an early phase of digestion, and it was triggered by a bell! Pavlov even showed that salivation (i.e. WANTING) was triggered in the absence of hunger by ringing the bell after the dogs had eaten been fed. By mapping out your High-Risk Times, you are discovering your “bell”, the settings and cues that have been paired with tasty foods or an abundance of food repeatedly and are now powerful triggers of WANTING.

    What is the outcome of this collision? Abundant and energy-dense foods ensured survival in our former environment. When we eat abundant and/or tasty food, it is tasty, sensed in our mouth and digestive tract and a signal is sent to our brain that we are eating survival-imperative foods. As the food and signals collide with our motivation system, we learn to associate the environmental cues around us with these foods. This is called associative learning or Pavlovian learning (see highlight on Pavlovian learning). After repeated associations, the environmental cues themselves gain the power to generate WANTING and make us GO AND GET.

    WANTING is also known as a desire, urge, impulse, craving, attention bias or incentive motivation and is often described as a wave because of its property of rising, cresting and falling. WANTING resides completely in the subconscious. WANTING occurs often without conscious awareness and is the driver of overeating. For example, if abundant and/or tasty food is paired enough times with the setting of night-time-couch-TV-dark windows-pre bedtime, eventually this setting itself reflexively and subconsciously generates WANTING and makes us GO AND GET. If the setting of walking through the door to your home at the end of the day —the jacket off, bag down walk into kitchen-—is repeatedly associated with pre dinner tasty energy-dense food and/or drink, eventually the simple act of walking in your door at the end of the day gains the power to generate reflexive WANTING for food and/or drink. In these two scenarios, the times of day and environments become established as High-Risk Times (HRTs)WANTING is different from hunger, but both are real and powerful physiological responses. Hunger resulting from going too long without food also triggers WANTING, but WANTING commonly happens without hunger and these are the times individuals take in more calories than they need because WANTING drives excessive calorie intake.

     

    Seventy percent of the likelihood of struggling with weight in one’s lifetime is inherited. Over 1000 genes so far have been associated with overweight and obesity and a majority of these genes are expressed in the central nervous system (brain), where our weight, appetite, and metabolism are regulated. The strength of this motivational drive is highly heritable. Stronger WANTING is considered a key heritable risk to weight struggles. WANTING resides completely in the subconscious; we have no access to the motivational system. WANTING is a neurological reflexive brain event that is mediated by a chemical called dopamine and can be clearly seen on MRI as this area of the brain lights up in response to food cues.

     

    bell icon.png

     

    Characterizing WANTING

     

    The tools in this section will help you learn the cues, places, times and settings where you now most commonly, reflexively and subconsciously, experience wanting. It is at these High-Risk Times (HRTs) that extra calories are most likely to be consumed. It is here that the reduced calories that can lead to weight loss are most likely to be found. What are the cues and settings that have, in your life, been repeatedly associated with tasty or abundant calories? Understanding and managing Wanting is significantly associated with improved outcomes.

    Change to bell icon.

    Mapping WANTING and your High-Risk Times

    Your WANTING map contains the cues, places, times and settings that have repeatedly been associated with abundant and/or tasty food or drink in the past, and where you now reflexively and subconsciously experience WANTING. What are these cues? 

    Mapping determines your High-Risk Times (HRTs). Please consider the following exercise to help you identify your HRTs.

    Let’s say that this is the timeline of your day. At the beginning of the line is when you wake up and the end of the line is when you go to sleep. Is there anywhere along this line where you would consider yourself, with any regularity, more at risk of eating more food (or drink) or less healthy food?



    Urge Surfing

    One way to gain a better understanding of WANTING is the exercise of urge surfing, or riding the wave of WANTING. This exercise may help you recognize and accept WANTING as an experience that you cannot necessarily stop or control, but that just happens in a patterned way.

    Consider the following steps to guide you through the exercise of urge surfing:

    1. Recognize when you are experiencing WANTING and acknowledge it for what it is. Try saying it aloud. (e.g. “I’m really WANTING something sweet / salty / crunchy / tasty right now. I know what this is,” or “I am experiencing WANTING / a craving right now.”)

    2. Be open to the experience of WANTING. Try not to suppress or fight it. Try not to judge it or label it as good or bad, right or wrong. Simply accept it as something that is happening to you in a moment of time.

    3. Observe the experience of WANTING:

    • Where do you physically feel it in your body?

    • How intense is it? (Score out of 10,  1 = very weak, 10 = very strong)

    • What thoughts are going through your mind (screening for permission thinking)?

    • What feelings are you experiencing?

    • Consider surfing the urge and see if the intensity of it changes over time – after 5 minutes, after 10 minutes, after 15 minutes.

    • Does it subside and if so, how long does it take?

    • If it subsides, does it come back?

    Understanding WANTING and its significant impact on eating behaviors, calorie consumption and weight is an important first step. In the treatment modules to come, you will learn behavioral and cognitive techniques and strategies to help you avoid WANTING if possible, minimize the intensity of WANTING, and manage WANTING when it occurs. Understanding and managing WANTING is significantly associated with improved weight loss outcomes.

  • Resilience

    In this final module, you will be asked to consider that SETBACKS are a natural consequence of any weight management effort and that success is determined not by whether or not you experience SETBACKS but by how you respond to them. This is the principle of resilience. Here you will be invited in a formal way to work on resilience.

    Process

    The process of resilience skill development is:

     

    1. Recognizing the thoughts and emotions that automatically arrive in the aftermath of a SETBACK; thoughts that speak poorly about you and your ability to manage your weight.

     

    2. Learning to challenge these thoughts is the process of generating resilience. You will discover how changing your thinking will help you recover from SETBACKS and maintain your motivation to adhere to your weight management efforts.

     

    You may remember from earlier that adherence—the degree to which participants are able to maintain the changes they have made—is most strongly associated with weight loss and improved health. Resilience is a key skill in determining adherence. Again, like WANTING and restraint, the capacity to practice resilience is considered a variable trait and is highly heritable.

    Another way to think of this is that SETBACKS can negatively affect adherence. The following are three common SETBACKS. When you read them, try to picture yourself in the immediate aftermath of each one, and imagine how you feel.


    In the restraint module, you were invited to discover, challenge and ultimately change autopilot thoughts, also called ‘permission thoughts.’ In this module you will see an exact parallel. You will be invited to discover, challenge and ultimately change another set of automatic thoughts. 

     

    Remember that we have two thinking systems: one that is fast and automatic, and a second that is slow, deliberate and forward thinking. Here, the fast thinking Autopilot generates thoughts that come when you are in the aftermath of a SETBACK. Where do these thoughts come from? Why are they there? 

     

    These thoughts are the product of your past weight loss efforts (if you have not tried to lose weight in the past, these may not be present and may not be an obstacle). If past weight loss efforts have been challenging or numerous it is quite likely that you have developed a library of automatic thoughts that:

     

     

    • Speak poorly about you as a person 

    • Speak poorly about your capacity to succeed in managing your weight

     

    These negative thoughts use your past weight loss efforts and failures as evidence against you. The predominance of these thoughts will also be the consequence of genetics, the presence of depression or anxiety, and even of childhood experiences. In what follows you will learn the proven method of developing and strengthening resilience.

    Three-step process for resilience

    Resilience is built using cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT). The actual tool of CBT is called cognitive restructuring; literally changing one’s thinking.

     

    The first step in the cognitive restructuring process is discovering your automatic post-SETBACK thinking.

     

    The second step is challenging those thoughts with evidence,

     

    The third step is creating new resilience thoughts based on your evidence.

     

    With practice, these new resilience thoughts may become the new response to SETBACKS, displacing negative thinking.

     

    Let’s explore these steps in more detail.



    Thinking unique to an overeating or overdrinking episode

    STEP 1: Discovering self-critical thoughts

    Capturing self-critical thoughts sounds easy enough but in fact, learned self-critical thoughts, as discussed earlier, are automatic and fleeting and often go unnoticed.

    Self-critical thoughts have unique characteristics.

     

    ✅ They immediately follow SETBACKS

     

    ✅ They are automatic, not controllable.

     

    ✅ They will speak poorly about you as a person and your ability to sustainably lose weight.

     

    The following are examples of what self-critical thoughts may sound like. Identifying self-critical thinking looks like a funnel.

     

    At the top are a bunch of thoughts becoming less and less as you get lower, and as little as one root thought at the bottom.

     

    At the top, in the aftermath of a SETBACK you may hear:
    “I should not have done that.”
    “What was I thinking?”

     

    So what does that say about you?
    It says I am weak—I should be stronger
    It says I don’t have enough willpower
    It says even when I do well, eventually I mess up
    It says even when I try hard, this does not work

     

    What does this say about the likelihood of succeeding long term?
    It says I can’t; It says I won’t succeed; It says this is too hard, and I can’t do this (root thought).

     

    This last thought at the bottom of the funnel is called a root thought. In the aftermath of SETBACKS this is an exceedingly common root thought.

    STEP 2: Where is the evidence?

    Fortunately this second step in resilience development is not necessarily easy but is certainly very straightforward.

     

    Ultimately you may realize that the evidence you hold that supports your thinking and your root thought is based on your past weight loss experiences and failures. So, for a moment think about your past weight loss efforts.

     

    In the past when you were provided an ethical, comprehensive and effective behavioural weight management program over a long period of time by trained health care professionals, potentially combined with effective and safe medication… how did it go? 

    It is very likely that your answer to this question will be, “I have never experienced that before.” But you see the bolded question above is the actual treatment for the real medical condition you live with.

     

    If you have never been comprehensively and effectively treated for the real condition you live with, this brings up a very important question!

     

    Is it possible that your past weight loss efforts are inadmissible evidence as to whether you can effectively and sustainability lose weight? Can you challenge the thoughts and root thought above based on the fact that you have never been effectively treated in the past?

    STEP 3: Creating new resilience thoughts

    This last step sets you up for thinking differently in moments of SETBACK. In place of self-critical thoughts, could you see yourself thinking differently? Could SETBACKS be followed by thoughts such as these?

    “I can view this as a reminder that this is difficult and that SETBACKS are inevitable. I know that how I do long term will not be determined by my SETBACKS but by how I respond to them. I know the automatic thought in this moment revolves around me not being able to succeed, but I also know that thought is based on my past. I have never been supported with a comprehensive behavioural treatment. I have never in the past been properly supported by safe and effective medication.”

    As confidence builds you may encounter thoughts in these moments that sound like:

    “I know what I am capable of. I know when I do it, it works. I know what to do and I know how to do it. I know the pathway that works for me and is still very enjoyable and at a level of effort that is sustainable. Let me roll up my sleeves and try to understand why this SETBACK happened. Let me get support.”

    From demotivation to motivation: all about the emotions

    There is a truism in psychology that thoughts lead to emotions that lead to behaviour. If unchallenged, the original self-critical automatic thoughts generate emotions such as frustration, disappointment, anger, sadness and feelings of failure. These emotions ultimately lead to demotivation and a single SETBACK can set you up for more SETBACKS and an unfortunate demotivational cycle can begin.

    Put simply, by identifying, challenging and replacing the automatic thinking, SETBACKS may become a source of motivation and a golden opportunity toward learning and progress and ultimately success.

    There are many aspects of weight management that you do not have control over, such as genetics, your upbringing and conditioning around food, the overall food environment that surrounds you, and how strongly your brain defends against weight loss. Having said this, resilience development is a skill that you can roll up your sleeves for and work on. You may not be able to control whether or not SETBACKS happen on your path to your best weight, but to a significant degree you can control how you respond to them. The skill of resilience can be developed progressively and the consequence is adherence, the key predictor of long-term success.



    Thinking unique to the scale SETBACK

    Here are some common scenarios related to the scale that can generate negative thinking and emotions and demotivation.








    Thinking unique to the body image SETBACK

    You have now learned that the aftermath of an off-track eating or drinking day or the aftermath of seeing a number on the a scale that is not in your favour can initiate automatic processes that lead to negative thinking, negative emotions and demotivation. 

    A third event that can ultimately result in demotivation is exposure to your own image.

    In this scenario, we discuss the thoughts, emotions and possible demotivation that can be the consequences of:

    1. Seeing yourself in a mirror or reflection

    2. Seeing yourself in a photograph

    First, a little background on the subject of body dissatisfaction The most common reasons given for wanting to lose weight are related to appearance, satisfaction with looks and attractiveness. You may be surprised to learn that weight loss is generally an ineffective way to accomplish increased satisfaction with how you look. It is extremely common that someone will lose weight and still feel dissatisfaction with their appearance. Body dissatisfaction, if present, is something that you may work on improving in parallel or independent of your body weight. 

    Body satisfaction, again, like so many other weight-related factors, is about your thinking. Those who feel better about how they look, change the way they think about their bodies. By changing the way you think about your body, you can improve how you feel about yourself.

    You may find it surprising to know that there is only a weak relationship between body satisfaction and actual appearance. It turns out that what you look like does not always correlate with how you feel about your appearance. This is particularly true when it comes to body weight. Many non-overweight people hate their appearance and many heavy people are content with their appearance and feel attractive.

    As the other modules in the Cognitive Restructuring sections discuss, body satisfaction comes down to your thinking. Your dissatisfaction with your body is much less about your body and much more about the thoughts and beliefs you hold about how you look. Throughout your life you have developed thoughts about your appearance that have been created in response to your day-to-day interactions with people and within our culture. Our society is very concerned with physical appearance and overweight is regularly stigmatized. How do you think and feel about your appearance, and how has today’s culture affected your thinking about your own appearance, body shape and size?

    Have you ever experienced personal or professional rejection, criticism or teasing based on how you look? What is the earliest life experience you can recall where attention was brought to your appearance, shape or size? Were there times in your life when people around you criticized your appearance, somewhere in your childhood years, in your teenage years or later in life?

    The path to body satisfaction involves working on accepting your body even though you recognize that your appearance may be less than perfect. In fact, good body image can be thought of as the result of several things which will be discussed below.

    STEP 1: Discovering self-critical thoughts

    Are you ready for the hard work of capturing the thoughts that have come to be associated with your appearance? Are you ready to improve how you feel about yourself? Remember that automatic thoughts lead to emotions. Your work starts by asking yourself the following questions:

    1. If you look at yourself in a mirror (or imagine yourself in a mirror), what thoughts and emotions can you identify?

    2. If you see yourself in a photograph or a reflection, what thoughts and emotions can you identify? 

    In these moments, might you feel emotions such as shame, embarrassment, disgust and a feeling of failure or hopelessness? Remember that these emotions are a product of your thinking; you may ask yourself what you were just thinking and what may have triggered these thoughts. Automatic thoughts are immediate and they will speak poorly about your image, who you are as a person and your ability to manage your weight.

    You may use the recognition of negative emotions as a cue that negative thinking patterns are happening. 

    The following are examples of what self-critical body image thoughts may sound like. Again, the self-critical thoughts can be looked at as forming a funnel. At the top are a bunch of thoughts that become less and less as you get lower, and then as little as one root thought at the bottom.

    At the top: I am too big. I am disgusting. I am unattractive. 

    So what does that say about you?
    It says I should be stronger – I am weak
    It says I am undisciplined 
    It says I don’t have enough willpower
    It says I’m a failure

    Which says what about the long term?
    It says nothing will change and I will always be like this.

    STEP 2: Where is the evidence?

    Again, this second step, “where is the evidence?” is not easy but certainly very straightforward. In the case of battling body dissatisfaction you have a significant advantage. Intellectually, everyone can imagine that the character of a person, their kindness, their values, their generosity, have nothing to do with the shape of their bodies. You have learned elsewhere that 70% of the shape and size of someone’s body is influenced by genetics and governed by a unique three-layer ancient appetite system. You have learned that although effective treatment exists to support finding one’s best weight, you have likely never received such treatment before.

    You also learned to believe your internalized self-critical thoughts early in life because of the societal stigma directed at overweight individuals. Can you challenge these previous thoughts? What if your thoughts about you and your body are different from what others think about you? Imagine if we brought all your close friends together in one room and asked them about you. What if we asked them if they agreed that you were disgusting, weak, undisciplined and a failure? It is very likely that your friends would argue vehemently against this characterization. 

    Ultimately you can realize that any evidence you hold that supports your current thinking is based on stigmatizing and biased internalized messaging from your past. Furthermore, you have never been comprehensively supported for the real condition you struggle with, yet effective treatments exist.

    STEP 3: Creating new resilience thoughts

    This last step sees you thinking differently when exposed to your image. In place of the above self-critical thoughts, could you see yourself thinking differently? Could seeing your image be followed by thoughts such as:

    “I am on a journey to find my best weight. My struggle is real and I have never been treated before – not once. Who I am as a person is not a product of my shape and size. I do not have to love the way I look but I can certainly challenge the notion that how I look speaks to who I am as a person. I will work in the direction of finding my best weight and I will consider accepting , maybe begrudgingly at first, that my best weight is the best I can do.”


  • Values

     Core values guide the way people live their lives and represent what is most important to them. In weight management, being aware of one’s values can help foster a willingness to choose the difficult but worthwhile choices, such as not giving in to a craving, or exercising even when tired. Managing weight requires ongoing effort. Values provide a strong reason one may be willing to work hard over the long run.

    Values – What Are They and Why Are They Important?

    People are capable of difficult work long into the future if the work leads them in the direction of the things that are most important to them. The behaviours involved in successful weight management require lifelong attention and work. What might be important enough to you in your life that it would make you WILLING to attend to and work on these weight management behaviours long term? Core values are the things most important to you in terms of how you wish to live your life. Whether you are fully aware of your values or not, they are guiding forces that influence your daily decisions and behaviours. When we do things that are aligned with our values we tend to feel good about them, and we’re even willing to experience some discomfort or inconvenience by living in this way because it’s important to us. When we live in a way that doesn’t support our values, usually there are signs of unease or dissatisfaction in us.

    Long-term weight management is not easy and requires a willingness to even experience some short-term discomfort from time to time. The discomfort of passing up a tasty treat, preparing a simple meal at home instead of going through a drive-thru or ordering in when pressed for time, or exercising when you feel tired are all examples of the short-term discomforts you may experience. However, these discomforts may be minimized if those choices and behaviors are aligned with your values.

    What does the evidence say?

    The best clinical weight management outcomes to date integrate as a central strategy a behavioral commitment to clearly-defined values. This paper from Forman and butryn also explains this principle. 

    The Difference Between Values and Long-Term Goals

    Distinguishing between values and goals is important. Values are a direction while goals are a destination. Values are a compass or a guide to help determine the direction you want to be going. You strive in the direction of your values but never reach them because they are not a destination. Long-term goals, on the other hand, are destinations, such as losing this much weight or fitting into this pants size. There are risks in setting long-term goals when it comes to weight management; you may not be able to achieve your goal, and this could result in disappointment, self criticism and giving up. Another risk of long-term goals is if you do reach your goal, what will motivate you to keep going after that, since managing weight requires long-term effort? Goals may change over time, be achieved or prove too difficult. In contrast, a person’s core values tend to be constant and permanent.

     

    What Are My Values?

    A good place to start is to think about why you want to lose weight sustainably. For example, some may say, “I want to lose weight because I want to be healthier.” A rule with values is that if you can ask “why,” you have not yet found the underlying value. Why do you want to be healthy? “If I lose weight, I will have more energy and mobility.” Why do you want to have more energy and mobility? “I really enjoy participating in fun activities when travelling, like hiking, scuba diving, and canoeing, and I like cycling with my kids on the weekends. I want to share in all the experiences with my spouse, children and grandchildren long into the future.” Aha! Let’s start to capture the values statement. We suggest you may start your values statements with the phrase, “I want to be working in a direction where my weight and health are least preventing me from…” Below are some example of values statements.


    What about the value of fun?

    Considering the balance between two values

     

    You will also be asked to consider maintaining a loyalty to enjoying the experience of good food and drink with family and friends, in socialization and in celebration. You may think that these values would seem contradictory to your values of health and quality of life. In a way, the opposite is true; sustained behaviour change to achieve weight loss requires maintaining a loyalty to all your values.

     

    Flexibility and Balance

    Consider asking yourself before a dinner party, “How would this night end if I were to be loyal to both my values for 1) health and 2) fun, food and friends? How can I still enjoy the pleasure of good food and drink and yet minimize any negative impact on my health and weight?”

     

    If you are celebrating an occasion with your family at a restaurant, you may choose to consider this a “celebratory meal” and plan for extra calories so that you can include a glass of wine (or two) and a shared dessert, for example, if these are important ways for you to enjoy the experience. In contrast, if you are dining out because you didn’t have a chance to grocery shop on the weekend, you may choose to consider this a “functional meal.” A functional meal would represent a meal you would otherwise eat at home, such as a healthy entrée. Prioritizing your values for health in this instance could mean avoiding the bread basket, appetizer, dessert, alcohol and fried foods.

     

    * Values Are Different From Feelings

    It’s very common for people to pursue weight loss to feel better about their appearance, to feel more attractive, to be more satisfied with how they look, and as a result feel more confident. Although weight loss may help a person feel better about their appearance, it is generally an ineffective way to improve body satisfaction in the long term. Body dissatisfaction is less about your body and weight, and much more about the thoughts and beliefs you have about your appearance.

    You can work on improving body satisfaction independent of weight loss. An effective technique is cognitive-behavioural therapy, which can help you change the thoughts you have about your image and thereby decrease your feelings of dissatisfaction. By changing your thinking, you can improve body satisfaction, self-esteem and confidence.

    See resource: Resilience Module for more information on improving body satisfaction through cognitive- behavioural therapy.

    Now that you have identified your values and what is most important to you, think about what eating habits and exercise habits reflect those values. When making decisions about food, drink and exercise ask yourself, “Is this decision aligned with my values?” “Of course, I can eat this, drink this or forgo this activity, but … is this decision in line with the direction I want to be going in, towards the things that are most important to me?” It’s amazing how powerful pausing and asking these questions can be in helping with decisions related to eating and activity.

    Behavioural Goals Aligned with Values

    If values are the reason weight management is important to you, behavioural goals are within your control and can help keep you in line with your values. Setting daily behavioural goals, such as “I will pack a healthy lunch instead of going to the food court,” can increase the likelihood of behaving in a way that is in line with your values. See resource Daily Goals: A Plan for One Day for more information on setting behavioural goals.

    See resource: Daily Goals: A Plan for One Day for more information on setting behavioural goals.

    Values Reflection

    This may sound obvious, but behaviours that are followed by a positive experience tend to be repeated. Conversely, behaviours that are followed by a negative experience tend not to be repeated.

    This simple learning principle was embedded into psychology in 1898 by Edward Lee Thorndike when he introduced his law of effect. Later (1913), B.F. Skinner further studied and defined this learning principle with the term reinforcement.

    The exercise of values reflection is based on this simple learning theory—the principle that behaviours that are followed by a positive experience tend to be repeated, and behaviours that are followed by a negative experience tend not to be repeated. The values reflection exercise invites one to ask at the end of the day, “Did I move in the direction of my values today? Were my decisions around food and activity in the direction of what is most important to me?”

    When the answer to this questioning is yes, this reflection may be naturally and immediately followed by any number of positive emotions including satisfaction, happiness and hopefulness. These positive emotions serve to reinforce the behaviours and increase the likelihood that the behaviours are repeated.

    What if the answer to the above questions is no? “No, my eating and activity today were not aligned with my values.” In this case, the reflection may be naturally and immediately followed by any number of mild negative emotions including mild dissatisfaction and unhappiness. These mild negative emotions serve to do the opposite of reinforcement, making the off-track and undesirable behaviours less likely to be repeated.

    In this model, off-track days become important learning opportunities, potentially leading to behaviours that next time are on track.

     

    Beware of Self-Critical Thoughts

    A big caveat. The end-of-day reflection exercise carries some risk. Reflecting on your day can generate thoughts of self-criticism!

     

    Self-Critical Thoughts – On-Track Day

    Even an on-track day can be followed by self-criticism.

    “Sure, one day, big deal. I’ve put together good days before, only to be followed by gaining weight. Let’s not break our arm patting ourselves on the back”

    Here, self-criticism disables the positive emotional experience required to reinforce the day of on-track behaviour, and the new learning does not take place. 

    Self-Critical Thoughts – Off-Track Day

    An off-track day can, of course, also lead to self-criticism. Self-critical thoughts go beyond feeling unhappy or dissatisfied about the day. They can affect your sense of self-worth and belief in your abilities to manage your weight. They can lead to a sense of defeat and hopelessness. For example, reflecting on an off-track day may generate thoughts such as:

    “I shouldn’t have done that! Here I go again. I’m weak. I have no willpower. I will never succeed at this. It’s too hard.” These thoughts lead to strong negative emotions that then lead to demotivation. 

    We said earlier that when off-track days occur, the goal is to experience mild negative emotions that promote learning and positive changes in behaviour. The strong negative reaction described above puts you at risk of not being open to positive learning. Fortunately, this subject is covered comprehensively in the resilience module. If the end-of-day reflection exercise on off-track days feels demotivational, please reference the resilience module.

    End Of Day Reflection Exercise


    END-OF-DAY REFLECTION

    At the end of the day, find a place where you can be uninterrupted. Think about your values and the goals you had set for that day. Reflect and ask yourself two questions—the only two possible answers are Yes or No.

    All too often, people look to reinforce all the hard work of weight loss by looking at the scale or how their clothes fit, or whether they are receiving compliments from other people or if their health goals are being realized. The problem with using these outcomes to reinforce our behaviours is that they don’t happen immediately adjacent to the behaviour we are looking to reinforce. For example, if you are teaching a dog to roll over and you are holding a cookie in your hand—if the dog rolls over, you do not go away and bring the cookie as a reward the next day. You give it right away, along with encouragement, and the dog FEELS good immediately; the emotional reward comes right after the behaviour and the behaviour is thereby reinforced. 

    Looking to the scale for reinforcement is the equivalent of rewarding a dog that followed a command the next day or at the end of a week! Also note, as well-described in the “glycogen” material, the scale is not always a reliable indicator of progress. Rewards should come adjacent/beside the behavior you are trying to reinforce, not the next day or week.


    WAS I ON TRACK TODAY?

    ON TRACK

    If your answer is Yes, then the second question is:


    What is the experience like for me to have an on-track day?

    What is it like to acknowledge in that moment that you are on track to where you want to be with your daily goals and are moving in the direction of your values? Though you may be on a long road, right now, you are exactly where you wanted to be. What is this experience like and how does it make you feel? What thoughts come to mind?

     

    (Download the worksheet to complete the activity)


    WAS I OFF TRACK TODAY?

    OFF TRACK

    If your answer is No, then the second question is:


    What is the experience like for me to have an oFF-track day?

    What is it like to acknowledge that in the moment you are not on track to where you want to be with your daily goals, and made choices that do not support your values? What is this experience like and how does it make you feel? What thoughts come to mind?

     

    (Download the worksheet to complete the activity)

     

    Consider documenting your end-of-day reflections in the food notes in My Fitness Pal or in an electronic or paper journal.

  • Calorie Deficit, Diet and Exercise

    Calorie Deficit

    At its most basic level, weight gain occurs when calorie intake exceeds calories expended. Conversely, weight loss only occurs when energy intake is less than total calories burned. Weight loss occurs when calorie intake is reduced, regardless of the percentages of fat, protein or carbohydrates eaten. Calorie intake, not carbohydrate intake, is the determinant of body fat gain or loss. At this point, the calorie content of food is literally the only food property that has ever been convincingly demonstrated to impact how much fat is carried in our bodies. This was most recently validated by a meta-analysis of 20 studies suggesting that “for all practical purposes … a calorie is a calorie” as it relates to body-fat-weight.

    Studies consistently show that once heavier, heavier individuals consume and expend approximately 20%–30% more calories than lighter individuals. Studies held within tightly controlled laboratories/dormitories demonstrate that reducing calorie intake by this same number invariably causes fat losses, suggesting that higher calorie intake is required to maintain higher weights.

    Weight loss happens only if our calorie intake is lower than the total number of calories we burn, but the math should not be mistaken as simply “calories in–calories out.” The math changes in predictable ways when, as discussed, the brain detects fat loss (think GateKeeper), and generates increased appetite and decreased metabolic rate to favour weight regain.


    Diet

    What is the best diet for weight loss? What if the answer was a resounding NONE? You will be asked to consider disregarding the debate about the optimal weight loss diet. Despite years of searching, no best diet has been found. Countless studies comparing different diets (e.g., low carbohydrate, ketogenic, low fat, intermittent fasting, Mediterranean) have shown minimal and inconsistent differences in weight loss and health outcomes. In randomized, controlled trials, low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets yield similar and very modest long-term weight loss results; weight loss differences between the two diets are “minimal” after 12 months.

     

    The generally invalidated carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis

    “I thought carbohydrates were bad for you?” There is a decades-old popular hypothesis that says that your weight is about the carbohydrates you eat and not the calories. This hypothesis says that when you eat sugar and simple carbohydrates, your insulin levels increase, resulting in the storage of fat, increased appetite and slowed metabolism rate. This hypothesis is called The Carbohydrate-Insulin Hypothesis (CIH), and it is the theoretical basis for ALL low carb dieting, ketogenic dieting and intermittent fasting. But is it true? Fortunately, hypotheses can be tested. Is insulin the determining factor in fat gain due to its direct effect on fat cells, hunger and metabolic rate? Note, a majority of evidence is contrary to the CIH and readers are reminded to reference the Internalized Weight Bias module, where the prevailing theory of fat gain is described as a product of a collision between a unique, inherited brain-centred appetite system and our modern obesogenic food environment.

    In 2012, millions of dollars were raised and the Nutrition Science Initiative (NuSI) was founded to investigate the carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis. The organizers were proponents of low carb dieting and they set out to prove the hypothesis. They organized three significant clinical trials and recruited three serious researchers: Kevin Hall, Christopher Gardner and David Ludwig. Spoiler alert: of the three published studies funded by NuSI, at least two, and possibly all three, decisively refuted the carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis.

    The First NuSi Study

    The first studywas conducted by an impressive group of obesity researchers including Kevin Hall, Rudolph Leibel, Michael Rosenbaum and Eric Ravussin. A simple and elegant design saw 17 volunteers with overweight or obesity confined to a laboratory/dormitory for 8 weeks. Every calorie they ate was measured and provided. For the first 4 weeks they were fed a high carb–high sugar diet, and for the second 4 weeks they were fed a very low carb ketogenic diet. Metabolic rates were measured using both a chamber and something called “doubly labeled water.” Body composition was measured using the gold standard DEXA, and relevant blood markers were measured, including insulin. The results were devastating to the CIH. The high-carb diet demonstrated superior fat losses. The ketogenic diet reduced insulin levels by 50% but the rate of fat loss actually slowed, which was the opposite of what the carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis predicted.

     

    The Second NuSi Study

    The second study was called the DIETFITS Randomized Clinical Trial. DIETFITS may be the most rigorous diet comparison study ever done. The study was conducted by the talented Stanford researcher Christopher Gardner. The study compared a whole food low-fat diet to a whole food low-carbohydrate diet in 609 subjects over a period of 12 months. Each subject attended 22 sessions with a registered dietitian; no calorie intake targets were given. The study looked to see if genotypes or insulin production predict weight loss. DEXA was used again to measure body composition, and metabolism was also measured.

     

    What did the study find? Importantly, the study found that the two groups stuck to their assigned diets of either low carb or low fat throughout the study (this is a sign of a well-executed study). More importantly, the study showed no significant differences in weight loss between the two groups. Also, it was found that neither genetics nor insulin levels could predict weight loss.

     

    If you look at the results in the “waterfall plot”, you can see similar results between groups and notable variances between individuals in the same group! In fact, the differences in weight loss between individuals on the same diet were much larger than the variations between diets, suggesting differences in adherence were more important than differences in diet.

     

    The DIETFIT study served to replicate the results of numerous other randomized, controlled studies showing the proportion of fat and carbohydrates to matter very little for weight loss, again seriously challenging the carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis.


    The Third NuSi Study

    The third study compared the effects of low fat vs. low carb on metabolism through 20 weeks of weight maintenance following weight loss. Weight, insulin levels and metabolic rate were measured using the doubly labeled water technique. In support of the carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis, the authors reported that a very low-carbohydrate diet led to a higher metabolic rate than a low-fat diet. However, a reanalysis of the raw data suggests that the effect may be an artifact. As described by Kevin Hall, “analyzing the data according to the original pre-registered statistical plan resulted in no statistically significant effects of diet composition on energy expenditure.” This alternative analysis of the data is also consistent with a meta-analysis of 32 controlled studies examining the same phenomenon that found energy expenditure favoured low fat diets! 

    Taken together, it has been a tough few years for the science of low-carb dieting and the carbohydrate-insulin hypothesis.

    What about intermittent fasting?

    Ethan Weiss, a cardiologist at UCSF, was successful losing weight using intermittent fasting but he was uncomfortable recommending it to his patients because of a lack of research with human subjects as study participants (rather than mice). Ethan decided to conduct the first-ever human randomized controlled trial comparing intermittent fasting with continuous eating. The researchers chose the 12PM–8PM window. The primary end point of the study was weight loss at 12 weeks.

     

    The TREAT trial was published in 2020 and what did they find? According to Ethan in a popular twitter thread:

     

    “Well, let’s start with the bottom line. This was a negative study. Intermittent fasting did not lead to a statistically significant difference in weight loss at 12 weeks.”

     

    Again, the same type of waterfall plot shows differences between individuals but not significant differences between the continuous meal timing (CMT) and the time restricted eating (TRE).




    There were also no differences between groups in insulin, glucose, lipids, sleep, activity, metabolism or fat mass.

     

    Of note, and a potential warning of harm for those considering intermittent fasting, is that the intermittent fasting group was found to lose more lean mass (muscle) than the continuous eating group.

     

     

    Adherence is the key (not diet)

    Look at the red circles in each of the waterfall plots. Within them they contain a representation of the individuals in the trials who best maintained adherence to the behavioural changes—primarily to eating less. The only consistent finding among trials that compare diets is that adherence—the degree to which participants maintained effort and continued in the “program” was strongly associated with 1) weight loss and 2) improved health.

     

    Can you find help with adherence? It is the fundamental role of a weight management behavioural program to support and improve adherence! Behavioural programs support adherence and therefore behavioural programs lead to greater success. This material in its entirety comprises a comprehensive behavioural program.

    Eating healthily

    Eating healthily promotes health of body and mind. There is minimal controversy as to what constitutes eating healthily. To eat healthily one considers a diet of minimally processed whole grains, fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, lean dairy, good fats and minimal alcohol. At the same time most of us value food +/- drinks, fun and friends, socialization, celebration and the positive and unique role food and drink play in all of these experiences. (For more information regarding healthy eating, please reference the parallel nutrition program material including “Healthy Eating: Why it Matters” and “Optimizing Nutrition: Health-Promoting Foods”.)

     

    So, would you consider finding your own “best” diet, the healthiest eating that is realistic, enjoyable and sustainable? Importantly, the behaviours and effort level adopted to lose weight will be the same as those needed to maintain weight loss, so consider eating in a pattern and effort level that is both enjoyable and sustainable. In a parallel nutritional program, you will learn about the calorie density of foods and how to estimate portion sizes so that you can make the best assessment of your calorie intake. You will be invited to consider tracking your intake while being made aware that self-monitoring of food and drink intake is not for everyone.

     

    Exercise

    Next to quitting smoking, physical activity is the most valuable behaviour available to improve longevity, quality of life and chronic disease risk reduction. You will be encouraged in this behavioural program to be active, to identify obstacles to physical activity , and to develop skills and strategies to overcome these obstacles.

    Surprisingly, studies show that exercise alone will not promote significant weight loss in most people. In an important systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, researchers found that moderate intensity exercise programmes of 6 to 12 months’ duration were associated with only modest improvements in weight (~4 pounds), waist circumference (~2cm) and cardiovascular risk in overweight and obese populations.

    Exercise, despite its significant health and quality of life benefits, may have significant limitations in its ability to establish a calorie deficit and weight loss. In a landmark clinical trial, Herman Pontzer and colleagues show that even low levels of physical activity increase the number of calories we burn. This makes sense: the more active we are, the more calories we burn. However, the researchers found that at higher levels of activity there is no expected rise in energy expenditure and that the body adapts to maintain total energy expenditure within a narrow range. This is called the constrained model of energy expenditure. What this model suggests is that if you were to burn 400 calories today on a treadmill, in response, your body would over time burn 400 calories less than what it was going to just to make up for the extra calories that you burned! If this seems unfair, it may seem less unfair if you consider this mechanism against burning extra calories as adaptive in an environment when work was required to find food and calories could be scarce.

    This information is critical to understanding the place of exercise in weight management. You will learn in the Modulators module that stress, fatigue, depressed mood and anxiety can all challenge weight loss efforts by increasing your appetite and decreasing your ability to self-regulate against WANTING. Exercise can be very beneficial because exercise clearly and positively impacts stress, fatigue and mood. In fascinating trials, exercise has been shown to potentially directly reduce WANTING signals in the brain (dampening the GoGetter).

    Like best diet, you will be asked to establish your “best” activity level, the highest level of activity that is enjoyable, reasonable and sustainable. For more information on the place of exercise in weight management, please reference the exercise material “Physical Activity and Your Weight”.

     

  • Expectations

    How much weight will I lose? How much weight should I lose? I was told I should lose 40 pounds. I want to fit into my clothes! I know when I was x-number-of-pounds I felt great.

    What are your thoughts about your weight loss expectations? Many people beginning a weight management effort will have thoughts about a target or goal weight, and thoughts about what would be their ideal weight. 

    Would you be surprised to know that your weight is considered something that you do not have control over? Put simply, weight is not a behaviour. It’s not something you do. Consider for a moment the key things that affect your weight that you DO have control and influence over. When you are eating as healthily and moderately as you can while still enjoying your life in a sustainable way, and when you are as active as you can be in a sustainable way, exactly where you land with your weight is determined by an appetite system that is hundreds of thousands of years old.

    Another name for your appetite system is your weight regulation system. It comprises three levels of your brain. This is where your weight is regulated; as you lose weight, the fat loss is expertly recognized by the GateKeeper in your hypothalamus, or homeostatic system. In response to weight loss, the GateKeeper will initiate changes that favour weight gain as weight loss is defended against. Specifically, your metabolic rate will decrease and WANTING via the GoGetter will increase as your motivation system becomes strengthened. These changes are the reasons for the characteristic “shape” of all successful weight loss efforts as seen below. This shape is so characteristic of almost all weight loss patterns you could think of this graph as “the shape of human weight loss.”

    In a landmark review paper, Kevin Hall and Scott Kahan describe this process. Consider the shape of the above graph as a representation of the steady behavioural battle against a biological response that progressively opposes weight loss. You should know that all of this data is the product of validated mathematical models of energy expenditure applied to real weight loss seen in real humans, all with accurate gold standard metabolic rate measurement. While weight and metabolic rate are measured directly, energy intake, appetite and effort are estimated.

    To explain why the shape of weight loss looks like this, the researchers used the example of a hypothetical 90-kg woman who loses weight and keeps it off. The weight loss she experiences is represented by the graph below. Note that her weight loss plateaus at approximately six to nine months.

    In our example, before her weight loss effort, this hypothetical 90-kg woman was consuming an average of 2,600 calories per day and burning an average of 2,600 calories. She was consuming what she was burning and therefore her weight was stable.

     

    The weight loss process begins with this woman dropping her calorie intake from 2,600 down to 1,800 kcal per day, thereby establishing an 800 calorie per-day deficit. This is the change that initiates her weight loss.

     

    This next graph suggests what happens as her metabolic rate slows in response to her calorie deficit and subsequent fat loss. Look how it drops from 2,600 kcal per day to roughly 2,400 kcal per day within the first month, followed by a stabilization. This is how the GateKeeper drops the metabolic rate in defence against fat loss.

    What about calories in? This is important. Increases in calories consumed is considered the most important determinant of the slowing and eventual plateauing of weight loss, along with this characteristic graph shape. Look what happens to her energy intake! She starts consuming 1,800 calories a day, but as soon as she starts losing, she is immediately consuming more! By three months she is (often unwittingly) consuming an average of 2,200 kcal per day, a full 400 calories more a day than she was consuming when she started her weight loss! By six to nine months she is consuming an average of 2,400 calories per day.

    So you see why at six to nine months her weight is plateauing. At six to nine months she is consuming 2,400 kcal per day and her metabolic rate is 2,400 kcal per day. She is consuming what she is burning and her weight loss has stopped.

    The next curve is very telling. This is the answer to why this woman was driven to eat more as soon as she started to lose weight. This graph shows the actual changes in her appetite. The appetite here is defined as the number of calories her brain would prefer her to be eating each day to regain the weight she lost. This graph shows that in response to weight loss, appetite and therefore intake immediately increase. Think of this as the GateKeeper recognizing fat loss and making the GoGetter (appetite) work harder.


    What follows may seem a bit confusing but it is worth trying to understand because this is actually what happens. At first our hypothetical woman was eating 1,800 kcal per day and her appetite was asking for 2,600 kcal per day, so her effort was that of eating 800 kcal less each day than her brain—her appetite—would prefer. By three months in, her appetite is at 3,000 kcal per day, and you will remember at three months she was eating on average 2,200 kcal per day. This means that her effort at three months was the same as at the beginning: she was taking in 800 kcal less than her brain was asking for (but because she was eating more, her weight loss was already slowing). At six to nine months her brain is asking for 3,200 kcal per day (again the work of the GateKeeper and the GoGetter) while she is eating 2,400 kcal per day. Again her effort at six to nine months is the same: she is eating 800 kcal less than her appetite was dictating. At this point, though, because she is eating 2,400 kcal per day on average, her weight loss has plateaued. 

    This final graph demonstrated the point of adherence to effort. Here we see that to sustain weight loss calls for a sustained effort. In this graph the effort level is defined as taking in 800 calories less than your brain desires long into the future.

    So now you see that when you are beginning a behavioural weight loss program, it is suggested that you consider establishing a level of effort that is sustainable over the long term. 

    As the graph shows, when you are doing the best you can, at an effort level you can maintain, exactly where your weight lands is determined by the response to weight loss within you; your appetite system, which regulates appetite and metabolic rate. This is what it means when it is implied that you do not control your weight. You control, at best, your behaviours and effort. When you are doing the best you can do… your weight lands at a BEST WEIGHT. This graph shows that someone losing weight and keeping it off is practicing the same level of effort long into the future.

    You now understand that often, at around 6-9 months after beginning to lose weight, calorie intake will increase to the point where the number of calories consumed matches the number of calories burned. When this happens, weight loss stops, defining the characteristic weight loss plateau.


    In this scenario you work on finding your 1) most modest, 2) yet enjoyable, and 3) sustainable lifestyle, and then you stand back and let your brain and body “tell you” where your best effort lands you.

    In the above scenario there are two competing processes: 1) your brain defends your former weight while 2) you defend your BEST WEIGHT. Many people at this point will ask “does the brain ever give up trying to return you to your original higher weight—does it ever let up in its effort eventually? After all, does it not prefer you to be at a healthier weight?” Unfortunately, at this point we have no evidence of the brain letting up in either increased appetite or decreased metabolic rate. 

    You will read repeatedly in this material that overweight and obesity is a real medical condition that is primarily genetically conferred, progressive and centred in the brain. These concepts are very well illustrated here. Genetics determines the degree to which your brain defends against weight loss; the degree of increased appetite and the degree of decreased metabolic rate. Yes, this means that weight loss results will necessarily be unique to you. Understand that all the graphs above from the Kevin Hall review paper are taken from an average of thousands of subjects. Your results can be very different in either direction. This is why the concept of a predetermined target weight, ideal weight or goal weight makes no sense at all.


    Behavioural BEST WEIGHT and behavioural + medication BEST WEIGHT

     

    This is a really important point. If you are engaged exclusively in a comprehensive behavioural weight management program and you reach a plateau, further weight loss is possible and probable. It is extremely common and will continue to become even more common to see a behavioural program combined with a weight loss medication, also called an anti-obesity medication or AOM. AOMs can be very effective at creating a lower BEST WEIGHT. See this graph from a study called the Scale Maintenance Study. Here, after 12 weeks of losing weight with a diet, subjects were randomized to either a placebo or an AOM. What you see is that the two subsequent weight loss curves are the same shape but that the weight loss in the AOM group is deeper. You will remember that appetite and weight are regulated in parts of the brain (GateKeeper and GoGetter) that we do not have access to, but AOMs do. Here you can think of the effect of AOMs as dampening the brain’s “weight gain favoring” response to weight loss; hence, AOMs support weight loss. The GateKeeper becomes less alarmed by fat losses and the GoGetter becomes less sensitive to cues and WANTING decreases.


    If further weight loss would improve health and quality of life and yet you believe that you cannot realistically eat less at a sustainable effort, the addition of an AOM can be tremendously sensible. Currently, there are AOMs that are available, safe and effective. The effectiveness of AOMs—specifically, the average percentage of body weight loss achieved—is advancing significantly. The use of AOMs will be much more common and better understood in the near future, and AOMs should be an option for anyone who qualifies and is interested. 

    The health benefits of weight loss: they happen more significantly and earlier than you think

     

    A sustained weight loss of as little as 5%–15% results in clinically significant health benefits. These benefits include substantial reductions in deaths from heart disease and stroke, reductions in heart disease risk factors (high blood pressure and high cholesterol), improvement in or remission of diabetes, improvements in conditions such as sleep apnea, fatty liver and osteoarthritis. A 5%–15% body weight loss also importantly results in significant improvements in health-related quality of life. Larger percentages of weight loss have been shown to reduce the risks of a series of 11 cancers.


    Losing weight will make me feel better about my body, right?

     

    A common goal of weight loss is to feel better about how one looks. A common expectation is that weight loss always results in improved body satisfaction, and the more weight that is lost the happier one will feel. Would you be surprised to know that this is regularly untrue? Simply put, how you feel about yourself can be inconsistent with how you look. Many people who are thin or of average weight dislike their appearance or are dissatisfied with certain parts of their body. Many people who are heavy feel attractive and comfortable with their appearance. 

    The subject of body dissatisfaction, and the work involved in addressing it, is covered in the final section of the Resilience module. Briefly, body satisfaction is more about the beliefs you hold about your body than it is about the size of your body. These beliefs are shaped primarily from external messages that you have received about body shape from sources ranging from our weight-obsessed culture to your family, coaches and friends. Body satisfaction is about being more accepting and less critical of how you look. Those who have or achieve body satisfaction will describe that some aspects of their appearance they like and some aspects of their appearance they tolerate, but most importantly they spend minimal time focused on their image and more free to focus on other things.

  • Internalized Weight Bias

    WEIGHT BIAS AND STIGMA

    In this section you will be invited to consider that struggling with weight is struggling with a real condition that is:

    ✅ Mostly genetic

    ✅ Centred in the brain

    ✅ Strongly influenced by the environment

    ✅ Progressive in that the brain and body defend against weight loss

    ✅ Diets and/or exercise are ineffective long-term treatments

    ✅ Can be successfully managed in the long term with real treatment

    Weight Bias and Stigma

    Countering internalized weight bias is important because those who live with excess weight inevitably face negative attitudes and stereotypes related to their size and appearance from the public, the media, health care practitioners, and even family and friends. This stigma is based on a common misconception that being overweight or obese is a personal choice and could easily be reversed if one simply chose to eat less and move more. These biases are not only hurtful and damaging but are unfortunately—and inevitably—internalized. This internalization puts one at risk of stress, low self-esteem, learned helplessness and depression. Countering internalized weight bias is necessary, possible, and if done correctly can directly improve outcomes and quality of life.

    What if the risk of living with overweight or obesity was the risk of living with a real disease? What if past weight loss efforts were difficult not because of any failure on your part but instead because you are living untreated with a real disease? Diet and Exercise are not the treatment for this condition. What if treatment for this condition exists but you have never received treatment? Would struggling with weight still be your fault? The risk of living with Overweight and Obesity is primarily inherited, the genes are primarily expressed in the brain, and the condition is progressive.

    Effective long term treatment exists for those with overweight or obesity. The three pillars of treatment are behavioural treatment, medication and surgery. This internalized weight bias module, is the first module in an eight module comprehensive behavioural treatment. Safe and effective medication, and safe and effective surgery may be added to your treatment. To counter internalized weight bias, consider the following points.

     

    Evidence of REAL DISEASE

    Genetics


    Approximately seventy percent of the variability of size in all humans is heritable. There may be as many as 1500 individual variants of genes that determine your risk of struggling with weight in your lifetime.

    The Brain

    What many people do not know is that the majority of these genes that influence weight are expressed in the brain. Most of the differences in risk are based on differences in three areas of the brain that regulate metabolism, appetite and weight. These three areas comprise the appetite system and are called the homeostatic system (The GateKeeper), the motivation system (The GoGetter) and the executive system (The Sleepy Executive) as seen in this must see video. Genetic differences at each of the three levels are the main determinants of whether someone will struggle with weight in their lifetime.

    The Environment

    The human appetite system evolved from living in an environment where calories were often scarce and finding food involved work, hence the motivation to GO AND GET. The prevailing understanding of how and why obesity happens is that this ancient system has collided with the modern food environment; this ultra-processed, sugar, fat and salt added, ultra-portioned, ultra-available, anytime, aggressively advertised, delivered-right-to-your-front-door – food environment. It is also important to note that even the overabundance of healthy food in our current food environment can drive the overconsumption of calories and contribute to weight gain. Our planet’s obesity epidemic can be directly traced back in time to the early 1970s when all these food environment changes began. Collectively these changes refer to the ‘obesogenic’ environment.

    THE GO GETTER

    Neuro-hormonal response to weight loss that favours weight regain. In the event someone is able to lose weight, the body ‘fights back’ in response to weight loss, effecting powerful changes that favour weight regain. This is because to our ancestors, weight loss was never a good thing, and in fact was likely because their food supply was interrupted. To defend against fat loss, appetite increases and metabolic rate decreases, driven by the ‘homeostatic system’ or the ‘gatekeeper’, the lowest of the three levels of the appetite system. Fat cells make and release a hormone called leptin, so if leptin levels are dropping it means that fat is being lost. The homeostatic system is expert at recognizing dropping leptin levels and in response to this signal, the gatekeeper becomes alarmed and strengthens appetite/WANTING, the motivation layer is made more sensitive and we are driven more strongly to GO AND GET food. Ultimately, it is this progressive increase in the drive to GO AND GET that results in the characteristic shape of losing weight, where weight loss slows and slows and eventually plateaus. As we lose weight, we are driven to eat progressively more, and we are eventually driven to eat an amount that is the same as the amount that we are burning. We land at a break-even point. This defence against fat loss is an example of a system that provided an advantage in a former environment but now provides a disadvantage in this one. 
     

    Dieting and exercise are inadequate treatments for this condition. This is what you have tried but it doesn’t work long term for this brain-centred real medical condition. Instead, treatment works. The next step to countering internalized weight bias is to understand that treatment exists and you have never been treated before. If you have never once been comprehensively and effectively treated for this real medical condition, isn’t it possible that your past failed effort(s) at sustained weight loss are inadmissible evidence as to whether or not you can succeed going forward? It’s therefore important to know that treatment exists and it works.

    THE GATEKEEPER

    Treatment Exists

    Internalized bias is also countered by learning that effective long-term treatment exists for overweight and obesity. The three treatments are behavioural intervention, medication and surgery.

    Behavioural therapy

    You will learn that up to 30% to 50% of individuals clearly respond with long-term success to comprehensive behavioural treatments alone. Behavioural therapy targets the executive system, making the sleepy executive as awake as possible just when she or he is most needed. As a reminder, the homeostatic and motivation systems (The GateKeeper and the GoGetter) are in the non-conscious parts of the brain. You and I cannot get there, but medication can.

    Medication

    It is now common and appropriate that individuals may add medication as an adjunct to a behavioural intervention either immediately or through the course of their treatment. Medication use is considered as long-term treatment and has been shown, in 70% of patients, to support significant weight loss and significant improvements in health markers.

    Surgery

    A third component of treatment—surgery—may be considered for patients who qualify and/or for those whom behavioural intervention, plus or minus medication, is not satisfactory or successful. . The effect of surgery, like medication, acts in the non-conscious parts of the brain, even better improving the likelihood of greater weight loss and long-term success.

     

    So, the invitation reads –  would you consider that you have been struggling with excess weight not because of a flaw in character or a lack of willpower or motivation, but instead because you have been struggling untreated with a real condition, for which effective and comprehensive treatment exists?